As I have talked about my media niche which is crime dramas/anime in the 2 previous blog posts, it is time to start to plan out my research process. There are 3 main elements that I would like to tell in this blog post.
The key issue of my media niche is “why people like to watch crime dramas/anime even though most of them have miserable, emotional, and other negative scenes”, and this is part of my curiosity even though I also like to watch crime dramas/anime as I mentioned in the first blog post. I believe handling this key issue will be beneficial to understand the depth of the stories behind creating that.

As the purpose of crime dramas, it is explained as “providing entertainment, rather than to educate, research suggests that people learn about crime from watching television” (Rhineberger-dunn, Briggs & Rader 2016). However, there has not been proved that the audience acknowledges the purpose so this point will be one point of my research. What I would like to state is how much people are enjoying crime dramas/anime. According to Hogan’s report (2019), that talks about how much college students watch and enjoy crime shows, the result of his study shows about 50% of participants answered that they watch crime dramas every week, and about 80% of participants answered that they have ever watched comedic fiction, detective fiction, or courtroom dramas. Based on these facts, I would like to focus on the people who are engaged in the crime dramas/anime industry and the people who like to watch them as the audience. Focusing on these two different types of people will be able to get different reasons, intents, as well as results for my research.
To document my research, it is necessary to understand what OBSERVATION and AUTOETHNOGRAPHY are. It is summarised about what to observe as “the most important is the researcher’s purpose in conducting the study in the first place. In other words, the theoretical framework, the problem, and the questions of interest determine what is to be observed” (Merriam, Sharan, Tisdell, and Elizabeth 2016). Ellis, Adams, and Bochner (2011) defined autoethnography as an approach to research and writing that seeks to describe and systematically analyze personal experience in order to understand cultural experience. To analyse my experience of the field site that I mentioned in the last blog, I am going to use Twitter and Reddit as well as exploring on the Internet to gather as much information as possible and to analyse them. Using those sources will be part of my experiences, which will be involved in autoethnography as a result. Once I start to collect information, I will take screenshots and take notes on my laptop to make my research process easier. This activity enables me to analyse with enough information without impatience, which connects to reliable results.
To conduct my research, I would like to build up the schedule for my research process. What it is possible to clarify the tasks are;
– Determining my DA which platforms am I going to use
– Gathering as much information as possible with the sources
– Taking notes on how I feel and what I find through searching activity
– Taking notes about how other people think of the media niche
– Taking action to know how other people think of my research
This is my schedule in order to conduct those tasks.

This schedule is not enough to complete my project and this is just a plan by the date of my pitch. The more I start to research, the easier it is to occur many facts that I may consider to change plans so I would like to keep the flexibility in my mind.
References:
Ellis, C, Adams, T.E, and Bochner, A.P 2011, ‘Autoethnography: An Overview’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, no. 1, viewed 6 August 2020, <https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095>
Hogan, A 2019, ‘How crime dramas influence perception of crime ‘, BUTTER UNIVERSITY, viewed 20 August 2020, <https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1463&context=ugtheses>
Merriam, Sharan B. Tisdell, and Elizabeth J. 2016, Being a Careful Observer, in Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco
Rhineberger-dunn, G, Briggs, S & Rader, N 2016, ‘The CSI Effect, DNA Discourse, and Popular Crime Dramas*’, Special Issue: Gun Politics, vo. 98, viewed 20 August 2020, <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ssqu.12289>






